Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] (fwd) Re: Heathkit Copyright
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 19:19:53 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On 5/19/2010 6:35 PM, ham-radio-mail-lists@ahjg.co.uk wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 03:45:11 +0000, Charles Harpole<k4vud@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>    
>> "Kleenix" was denied copyright with the argument that the word had entered 
>> the language to such a thorough extent as to no longer just refer to one 
>> branded product.
>>      
"DeepFreeze" LOST their copyright to their name as it was in such common 
use that it was considered "generic".
That has always puzzled me that DOS was copyrighted as it is by itself a 
generic term.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> He fell asleep at the wheel and drifted over into the trademarks lane :-)
>
> I suggest regulating the screen voltage tightly to reduce third order IMD.
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>    
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>