Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Heath copyright

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Heath copyright
From: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:27:29 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Been fun folks but this has gotten way out of hand....

I don't see the benefit to anyone and it certainly does not have anything to 
do with building and operating amps...and only small impact on repairing of 
Heath amps if one is looking for documentation for free....

Now it's mutated to politics...next will be religion.

I'll show myself out through the unsubsciption process.

Cecil
K5DL
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Carter" <amps@hidden-valley.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Heath copyright


> Socialist?  If I am, it's because I learned it from the American
> Founding Fathers.  I cite the United States Constitution, Article I,
> Section 8, Clause 8, also known as the Patent and Copyright Clause.
>
> Patents and copyrights flow from the same Constitutional
> authorization.  The current spate of extensions to the copyright law
> was done to benefit the Walt Disney Company, not any actual authors.
> Corporations must be watched and should never be granted the same
> rights as people.  They serve a valuable purpose but must be limited
> to that purpose.
>
> To move back to amps, I humbly offer my Heath project for anybody who
> might not have already seen it:
>
> http://www.kd4rbg.com
>
> Jeff/KD4RBG
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:34:48 -0400, Jeff Carter wrote:
>>
>>>eternal copyrights, where all human knowledge/advances eventually become
>>>the property of an immortal corporation.
>>
>> But that's capitalism -- your position sounds like socialism to me. :)
>>
>> But that's not what we're talking about in the case of the Heath manual,
>> which documents a product that they sold (and with it, a copy of that
>> manual). Although I'm not a lawyer, tt would seem to me that using
>> another copy of that manual to work on their product if the original copy
>> of the manual happened to be lost would be "fair use," but use of the
>> manual to copy the product would not.
>>
>> But all of this is quite separate from a PATENT, which has different
>> rules for lifetime, and which is much closer to your "human
>> knowledge/advances" issue. The CIRCUITRY in the amp may be subject to
>> several different patents!
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim K9YC
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>