Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Rebuilding oxide cathode tubes

To: <jtml@vla.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Rebuilding oxide cathode tubes
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:50:02 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Thanks for that info John.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Lyles" <jtml@losalamos.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:19 PM
Subject: [Amps] Rebuilding oxide cathode tubes


>I believe the answer is that thoriated tungsten filaments are much easier 
>to copy and replace, than oxide cathodes.
> Its my impression that calcium, barium, strontium oxide chemistry is 
> somewhat proprietary among tube manufacturers, and to get long life 
> requires
> care and very clean conditions.
>
> 73
> John
> K5PRO
>
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: amps-request@contesting.com
> Date: Tue,  6 Jul 2010 12:00:37 -0600
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Amps Digest, Vol 91, Issue 10
>
>> Send Amps mailing list submissions to
>> amps@contesting.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> amps-request@contesting.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> amps-owner@contesting.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Amps digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Rebuilt tubes (Carl)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:42:46 -0400
>> From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Amps] Rebuilt tubes
>> To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>, "Bill Fuqua" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
>> Message-ID: <017c01cb1d3b$08d69e30$6501a8c0@DAVES>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> I wonder why there are no cathode type tubes in that list?
>>
>> Cant be done or not economically?
>>
>> Since I have 3 full output 3CX1000A7's I guess Im set for awhile. One is 
>> in
>> the 2M amp
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Bill Fuqua" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
>> To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:22 PM
>> Subject: [Amps] Rebuilt tubes
>>
>>
>> >    Look at
>> > http://www.cpii.com/docs/related/23/Tube%20Ratings%20Data%20for%20Devices%20Rebuilt%20by%20ECONCO.pdf
>> >
>> > It appears that ECONCO does rebuild some tubes as low as 1000 Watt 
>> > plate
>> > dissipation but only the rarer industrial, medical or scientific types.
>> > I suspect that if they did 8877's they would be over run by ham and 
>> > CBers
>> > and would not be able to take care of the other customers. I had a
>> > 3CW20,000 rebuilt one time for a sputtering power supply.
>> >    You can always ask if they will rebuild it.
>> >
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Bill wa4lav
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Amps mailing list
>> > Amps@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> End of Amps Digest, Vol 91, Issue 10
>> ************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>