Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:41:32 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:44:21 -0700
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Size of Parasitic Chokes



The tricky part is using enough inductor to be effective without
having so much that the resistor overheats when operating on ten
meters. A delicate balancing act, believe me. You can simplify the
balancing act somewhat by using a high wattage resistor, say 25 watts
or more. Typically, hams use a resistor of only a few watts or so and
that is where it gets dicey. The resistor must be non-inductive, of
course.

## the cheap and easy way out is a 20-25 watt globar.  On the 3CX-6000A7
amp we used a 50 ohm- 90 watt globar. [3/4" OD  x 5" long] ..and a few wraps of 
3/4" wide cu strap... [1"OD].  The C  from anode to cathode is very low to 
start with,
a lot lower than a 3CX-3000A7,  so I doubt it even requires a suppressor at all.
The installed suppressor doesn't affect the eff at all.  I had a bunch of these 
90 w 
globars on hand, so we used one. 

## Just before Henry radio stopped building the 8-K ultra, they had dispensed
with the suppressor altogether.   The original suppressor was 3 x 150 ohm , 1%
5-watt resistor's in parallel.  They were not reliable on 10M.  Next up was 
their 
infamous single turn ,chrome plated strap,  1"  wide material, and super 
thick...
and No resistor.  Henry Radio then tells me  the chrome did nothing, and then
went with a single turn of  silver platedCU strap [ again , NO resistor].   
The final version was no suppressor at all.   Apparently the stability problem 
was
 traced to the 2 x piece plate choke they used [20 uh  + 180 uh]    It was 
replaced with
 a different version  2 x piece plate choke... and the stability problem 
..vanished. 
The 8k used a 3CX-3000A7 . 

##  IF the amp is NOT going to be used/designed for 10m, then you have  less
problems with resistor's burning up.  Rob won't have any problems with his 
proposed 160-40m amp.  I used the eimac plastic sockets and strapped to
chassis. 





The best approach of all is to design the amp so no suppressor is
needed in the first place. This can be done by ensuring that the
cathode to ground input circuit has very low impedance at the VHF
parasitic frequency. If the impedance there is low enough, the tube
will not have enough gain to oscillate. Problem solved. 

## Agreed.  I noticed the Drake L4B uses C1 + C2 values on their
tuned inputs, that are  double the value of those used in the SB-220.
The L4B  has flat input swr across each band.  It's clear that the heath
SB-2220/221 has a Q that's  through the floor. Both the drake and heath amps
are 2 x 3-500Z types. 

## On my HB  3x3 and 3x6 amps... we used a pair of broadcast variable
caps [ 17-540 pf per section, and all 4 x sections in parallel].. and a tapped
4 uh coil [ 17 x turns of 6-8 ga wire on a 1.5" ID].  Both caps padded on 160m 
only...
[via a 2nd wafer on tuned input switch, which pads the C1 cap... and the 160m 
position on the
1st wafer pads the C2 cap. 4 uh coil is not tapped on 160M, since it's all 
being used, so that
free's up the 160m switch pos. ] I tried a lot of different loaded Q's on the 
various bands. 
 Since both metal tubes are aprx 50 ohm inputs, we  ran 50 ohm coax  from the 
C2 cap  to
 a bird wattmeter + dummy load, to test the tuned input. Another bird dummy 
load on the input side.   
With 200w drive.. [and caps tweaked for flat swr] the output wattmeter was 200w 
on low
 bands... and only 160W on 15M.  [ both amps only cover 160-10m]. 
 Just by INCREASING the coil by 1/4 turn, and DE-creasing the C1 + C2 caps a 
tiny bit, 
the power out, on output of the tuned input shot up to 190 W ! 

##  so u don't want the loaded Q to be too high either!!   

##  I got the  2 x broadcast variable + tapped coil  from Ron, VE7XR, who used 
a 
carbon copy of it on his  2 x  4-1000 amp.   His tuned input version was 
80-10m...
so neither of his broadcast caps  were padded. [ no 160m]  Ron got the idea  
from
Orr's last book, where Orr  used a pair of broadcast variables and a single 
coil.  
Orr depicts these tunable PI nets  on his 160 + 80m monoband amps.  His 160m
tuned input used permanently padded broadcast caps. 

## Ron just built a tapped coil version, so it works on 80-10m.  I took it one 
step
further, and padded both caps for 160m.  It was after a few go arounds with John
Lyles, that  I added the 2nd  bird line section on the output side.  Since a 
pair of 
4-1000's  and also a 3x3, 3x6  are aprx 50 ohms input Z... the length of coax 
from
C2 cap of tuned input.. over to the socket[S]  is not critical, and can be 
viewed as a 
50 ohm line extension.   Lengths up to 18"  have been used with great success.

## another trick to increase eff on higher bands is to install a 50-200 pf 
doorknob
right at the socket.   It's in parallel with the C2 cap of the tuned input 
anyway. This
puts more of the 'C2'  right at the socket itself, and increases tank eff. 

## having slightly too high a loaded Q on the upper bands was an eye opener. It 
was
the same calculated loaded  Q as the low bands.  Who would have thought to have 
stuck
a 2nd wattmeter on the output of a tuned input?  Yes, it is voodoo.  It's all 
voodoo,
then toss in stray C and stray L... and it's even more voodoo.

Jim   VE7RF
      





73, Bill W6WRT


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>