Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] construct ferrite "line isolator"

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] construct ferrite "line isolator"
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:27:07 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
If anyone has a problem with my replies or accuracy Id like to hear it 
either here or in private.

As far as the rest of Bills diatribe its not worth answering.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] construct ferrite "line isolator"


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:32:52 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>Your missing the point as usual Bill in your ongoing attempts to provoke
>>arguments.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Once again, Carl makes a personal attack instead of defending or
> explaining his statements. It's an old story but I'm not going to let
> him get away with it this time.
>
> My only "ongoing attempt" on this reflector is to clear out the crap
> which Carl has posted far in excess of every one else put together.
>
> He makes statements which are either patently false such as the one that
> "parasitic suppressor coils MUST be self resonant at the VHF frequency"
> and he refuses to back them up, or else he makes misleading statements
> such as the current one that "A 6 mix iron powder is good for 6-10M, I
> use it as the L in the input pi network for amps. If it works for you
> for HF RFI than thats (sic) good, Id guess it wasnt (sic) too severe and
> just a little bit of impedance did the job." which implies they are good
> in the low VHF region but have low impedance at HF, exactly  contrary to
> the manufacturer's data sheet. And he gives no information or examples
> why the manufacturer is wrong, only that he used mix $6 outside of the
> recommended range and it was satisfactory in his application. Palomar
> notes in their data sheet that toroids do indeed function outside their
> recommended optimum range with less effectiveness so that is nothing
> new.
>
> Anyone reading your garbage would conclude #6 mix is best at low VHF and
> relatively useless at HF, just the opposite of the truth as stated by
> both Micrometals and Palomar.
>
> You need a lot of watching over on this reflector, Carl. It's a dirty
> job but someone has to do it. I wish you were more careful in your
> statements so nobody would have to. I do not believe you are being
> malicious, just careless.
>
> This reflector is only useful when the information on it is accurate.
> Electronics is difficult enough when the information is correct. Toss in
> bad info like "carbon resistors when overheated always change upward in
> value" (paraphrased but accurate) and confusion mounts exponentially.
>
> If anyone wants a list of Carl's false or misleading statements, drop me
> an email at dezrat1242@yahoo.com. I've been keeping them for the last
> few months and the list continues to grow.
>
> Without doubt, Carl is going to complain to the moderator of this
> reflector that I should be kicked off, as he has done before without
> result. Everything I have said is true and documented so we shall see.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>