Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Chinese Caps Defective @ RF

To: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Chinese Caps Defective @ RF
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:07:15 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
While new HEC prices are a bit ridiculous there is enough high quality used 
doorknobs around plus the Russian surplus RF caps are also excellent.

I passed over those Chinese caps as a bad deal years ago once I found the 
actual specs.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Chinese Caps Defective @ RF


> You have a lot of circulating current through blocking caps on 10 m.
> For a critical application, I'd stick with a known manufacturer like
> HEC where you can see a range of specifications and test data.  You do
> pay more, but you only have to pay one time.   "off-brand" caps can be
> used in homebrew antenna tuners where it is okay to um, experiment.
>
> The dielectric temp. constant is one thing to consider and indeed, the
> caps should be class 1.   The other factor is the external temperature
> environment.  For example, are the caps mounted near a tube that
> throws off a lot of heat.   A good manufacturer will supply an
> environmental  temperature range spec. that the cap has to stay within
> to keep its value.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4891 - Release Date: 03/24/12
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>