Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Alpha &&DX Conversion

To: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha &&DX Conversion
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:34:59 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hams need more headroom to make up for inadequate cooling (Oh my. I dont like all that noise, how can I quiet it down?) and lack of understanding how to tune a tube with a fussy grid. Mindless QSY's without watching the grid meter dont help.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha &&DX Conversion


Vic,

Valid point but the FCC- registered efficiency was 58% and is typical of an FM broadcast GG design. The AEL FM 2.5K is a GG design and not tetrode-based as were the more common FM broadcast transmitters.

Paul, W9AC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Alpha &&DX Conversion


Paul,

Don't forget that the FM transmitter was probably running class-C which might be 75% efficient compared to the 60% or so available in class AB1/2.

On 9/5/2012 2:48 PM, Paul Christensen wrote:
"I will tell you why i run a 2 tuber, you put in 25 watts in and do 1500 easy not push a one tuber to do 1500 out. it all comes down to what you can afford. bill 73"

This may be an interesting point of reference. During my college years, I worked at a 3KW FM station in Rockford, IL as its chief engineer. The transmitter was an AEL FM-2.5K (FCC type accepted to 2.5KW output) and used a single 8877 to produce 2500-watts output at 104.9 MHz. All day long, every day, 365 days a year. A
three-bay circularly polarized antenna brought ERP to 3KW.

If a 77Dx is running intermittent amateur-class service but under high duty-cycle modes like RTTY at 1500-watts output (the U.S. legal limit, for example), I think its reasonable to assume that a 8877 is already operating with sufficient headroom of roughly 1KW. For what purpose do any of us need more than 1KW of headroom from our
vacuum tubes when producing 1.5KW?

Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


--
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5250 - Release Date: 09/05/12


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>