Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 4CX800A

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX800A
From: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:06:16 +1030
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Yes Val, a freshly factory minted Svetlana GU74B/4CX800A is indeed pricey
compared to the older date code NOS variety....but still much cheaper than
say the current list price of an Eimac/CPI 3CX800A7  :-)

Leigh
VK5KLT

-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Val
Sent: Monday, 29 October 2012 3:40 AM
To: gdaught6@stanford.edu; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] The GU84B and GU78B tubes

I think that the only right word that can be used in this sentence is 
"always". Having seen Svetlana's quotation I think that it's hardly likely a

ham will buy a factory new GU74B.

73, Val LZ1VB




>The 4CX800A's were often (usually?  always?) relabeled milsurp.


>73,

>George T Daughters, K6GT
>CU in the California QSO Party (CQP)
>October 6-7, 2012


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>