Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Reducing grid currents and improving gain

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] Reducing grid currents and improving gain
From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Reply-to: jtml@vla.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:35:42 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
A little tube history here:
RCA designed and manufactured beam power tetrodes such as the 6L6, 807, and 829B to increase power output, allowing the plate voltage swing to go lower without a large increase in screen current during the minimum. Without using a suppressor grid (as in a pentode), the beam was 'squeezed' (converged by focusing) where it passed through the gaps between screen grid wires, and so intercept was reduced. In addition, a space charge region was established out front of the screen between it and plate, to minimize the return of secondary electrons from the plate. This was called a virtual cathode, and it returned secondaries to the plate. A beam power tube would have lower screen current than a pentode. They did this by adjusting the pitch between grid wires, the alignment and spacing between grids and the other two electrodes, and the voltages applied.

Beam power tubes were a revolutionary step from earlier tetrodes with electrons from cathode that sprayed out through the grids, with no particular means of alignment. In 1955, RCA extended this concept to high power with tubes like the 6448 and later the 4616 tetrodes. In these, unit tetrodes were made with a filament rod or bar, enclosed on three sides by a copper frame. The edges of this U-shaped frame were the control grid. Carefully aligned was screen grid on the outer side following the same principles of the smaller glass tubes. Similarly, in triodes RCA built electron-optics using beam forming walls around each cathode bar, and shielded the control grid wires or bars from direct electrons. Carrying it further, they build shielded-tee structures that overlapped the grid bar, and reduced capacitance from it to plate. The shield acted like a zero-voltage screen. Big tubes like the 6949 made this way could produce 1/2 megawatt of CW power above HF.

RCA also developed radial cathodes that had alternating dead and active emitter bands, to emit beams in strips. By placing the grid wires in the regions without beam, it would greatly reduce grid current and emission due to bombardment from the cathode beam.

So what did Eimac do to improve their product? They developed a line of focused triodes and tetrodes. Using similar striped cathodes like RCA, they focused beams to avoid interception, This not only lowered grid current but also reduced IMD. Examples include the 4CX600J and 4CW800B beam tetrodes, and a series of focused triodes including the 8874, 3CX800A7 and U7, 3CX1500A7/8877, 3CX4000U7, 8938, 3CX1500U7, 8962, 8963, 3CX5000A7 and U7, and so forth up to the 3CX15,000B7. One of the big problems with oxide cathode tubes was the deposition of barium on the close-by grid, leading to loss of beam control as the grid became an emitter. Coatings were applied to the grids, permitting higher dissipation without excess grid emission. Sputtered carbon-titanium coatings called "Pyrogrid" were one example. Gold was a more expensive way.

Both companies, and I'm sure others as well, followed similar lines of development to produce excellent tubes that allowed power levels to rapidly increase to hundreds of kilowatts without grid destruction.

73
John K5PRO



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>