Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] k9yc pdf

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] k9yc pdf
From: Don Allen <w9cw@w9cw.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:07:19 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Although I basically agree with most of the points below, those of us who live on city lots, or small suburban lots, somehow continue to radiate reasonably decent signals on the bands without the benefit of a tower. or other "sky hook." Reality is always different than "what we'd like to do, or have," as it's often directly related to HOAs, incompatible lots, structures, or simply being a good neighbor by keeping one's avocation in perspective. Installing a 75 ft. tower on a small city lot within falling distance of a neighbor's home, power lines, etc. is simply not good engineering practice, and begs for a possible liability suit.

For many city or suburban hams today, ham radio operation has become a very serious challenge, not only for antenna installations, but sometimes even more importantly, locally-generated RFI levels. I remember when I first got my ticket back in 1961, and living on a small city lot in a very small town in Indiana, my noise level due to RFI-related issues was typically an S1 or lower. Today on my small suburban lot, my noise level can be as high as S7 to S8 due to the plethora of RFI generators in the neighborhood... power line noise, neighbor's plasma TVs, SMPS wall warts, utilities' smart meters, non-ballast florescent lighting, LED lighting... The list goes on and on. Personally, a high-dynamic range receiver with great blocking and two-tone DR specs is less important than one that offers a well-designed and functional noise blanker - having a rotatable loop receiving antenna and phasing networks are also sometimes required.

If entry-level hams took the well-written, and intended, points below as sacrosanct for ham radio operation, they would be well-advised to take up another hobby.

73
Don W9CW



On 1/13/2015 6:03 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
##  This pdf is very well done..and a real eye opener.   It also assumes you
are in the middle of a wheat field in Kansas.  Your typ back yard in suburbia
is not like that at all. You are crowded by other homes, 40 ft tall utility 
poles,
metal fences, metal cars, aluminum window frames,  miles of house wiring,
utility drop wires etc. Stucco homes have miles of well grounded chicken mesh
beneath their surface.  Toss in street lights and also freestanding 30 ft tall
aluminum street lamps.

##  Your backyard ground mounted 40m full size vertical, even  with lots
of ground mounted radials does not fare too well.  Its radiating into all this
junk, rendering it semi useless at best.     Inverted L verts on 160 + 80m
are in the same boat.   How are you going to get radials laid out 360 degs,
with a home and garage in the way ?   Trying to elevate radials on 160 +80m
in a typ small backyard is unobtanium.  30 ft high dipoles and yagis on the
upper 20-10m bands  still does not put the ant into the clear.  You are still
10’ below the utility lines, and still radiating into your neighbours homes.

##  Dipoles that dont rotate.... you just lost 14 db off the sides.  A rotary 
dipole is a huge
improvement over a fixed dipole.   When you increase the height from 30 ft to
50+ feet, the difference is almost staggering.   The ant is now in the clear.

##  trying to shunt feed a tower on a  city lot, with less than optimum length 
radials..and
only across 180 degs usually amounts to an exercise in futility.   Trying to 
get any type of RX ant
away from the TX ant is another exercise in frustration.   A quarter wave 
sloper or loaded
loaded quarter wave sloper at least puts the feedpoint at the top of the tower, 
with less
reliance on radials.

##  Even a 50 ft tower is only clearing the HV utility lines by 10 feet.  
Trying to guy a tower on a
small city lot is usually dangerous at best..and makes for any install or 
removal of ants very
difficult.   What does work on a city lot is the tallest, freestanding tower 
you can install.
Then you have something to work with. Not everyone is blessed with tall trees, 
suitably located
on their property.   The pdf is superb though.  In the clear and ...higher is 
better.   70-75 feet
is a good compromise between  a 50 ft tower and a 100 ft tower...when on 20m.   
For folks with
crank up towers, dial in the correct height for whatever band you are on, 
factoring everything else in.

Jim   VE7RF
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>