Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 154, Issue 9

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 154, Issue 9
From: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:25:41 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Bill,

It isn't SWR that kills a transistor, it's the EFFECT of SWR - excess voltage
or current at the drain.

Or excess dissipated power.

Some load impedances result in acceptable voltages and currents, but with a phase relationship between them that causes a higher power dissipation than the FET can handle. That's why a simple voltage and current sensor isn't enough for full protection. It has to sense the phase ratio too. And that's pretty much what an SWR bridge does!

Actually excess dissipated power is the main method to kill a FET. They usually have pretty good avalanching properties, so they can clamp any overvoltage in a safe way, as long as it doesn't result in excess heat. Likewise, the maximum drain current rating is usually high enough to handle the full power supply voltage without any risk. So they can't burn out from excess current. But power-wise they are very challenged. A typical solid state amplifier is designed in such a way that at nominal operating conditions, meaning max power and 1:1 SWR, the junction temperature is high enough to just leave a small margin to the value where the FET would fail. Any significant additional dissipation, such as the one that happens from a reactive load, will make the FET exceed the safe temperature, and could make it fail. Even without any overvoltage nor overcurrent!

Manfred

========================
Visit my hobby homepage!
http://ludens.cl
========================
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 154, Issue 9, Manfred Mornhinweg <=