Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 04:37:33 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
In electronic theory, electrons and current consisting of the electron flow in a vacuum tube are in the same directions. If they were not, then the mass spectrometers I worked on were really strange. We used electrons to vaporize a material. these negatively charged particles were focused and then the beam was sent through a curved gap between charged plates. The plates were between the poles of a very strong electromagnet. If you started to lose a tool to the magnet, you let it have the tool, otherwise your hand would be crushed between the wrench and the magnet pole. It'd take a small wrench right through your hand.

At-any-rate, between the magnet and the curved plate, the ions would be spread out according to mass, much like a prism spreads light. If the light from an arc is sent through a prism there will be spectral lines for the materials in the arc

The materials behave as predicted in real electronic theory. The electrons, if given enough push can erode a target, As I said earlier, conventional current is imaginary, but in "semiconductors" There are positive current carriers. A magnet can be used to determine the direction of the current flow and whether the current carriers are positive. Positive current carriers exist only in semiconductors and ions.

73

Roger (K8RI)


On 10/28/2016 Friday 2:56 PM, Jim Garland wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Amps [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gene May
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 01:39 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 166, Issue 26, reference direction of
current flow in
screen grids

Concur with Bill W6WRT re "positive vs negative" convention in describing
current.  The
convention we use now is left over from at least a hundred years ago when
a scientist
guessed wrong about the polarity of the electron.  To me, thinking in
terms of the direction
of electron movement is far more clear.
-Gene WB8WKU
Sorry to disagree with you and Bill,, Gene, but the standard convention for
electric current makes a lot of sense, and it's not just that somebody
guessed wrong a century ago about the polarity of electrons. The important
concept is that electric current is a statistical concept. Electric current
is sometimes carried by positive charges, sometimes by negative charges, but
the sign of the charge carrier is an entirely separate issue from the
direction of current flow.  In a vacuum tube, plate current flows into the
plate and out of the cathode, even though the motion of the electrons in the
tube envelope is in the reverse direction.  Similarly, current flows into
the collector of an NPN transistor and out the emitter (hence the words
collector and emitter), even though transistor current may be carried by
holes.  Similarly, current flows out the positive terminal of a battery and
returns into the negative terminal, no matter whether the charge of the ions
in the battery are positively or negative. It would be a nightmare to keep
track of current flow, if the direction of flow depended on the sign of the
underlying charge carriers.  You might have situations where current flows
out of a B+ supply to the plate of a tube, and then is annihilated by
current flowing in the opposite direction from within the tube, coming from
the cathode.

One further tidbit. In a metal, copper wire for instance, the conduction
electrons move in all directions. The current is caused when an electric
field shifts the motion a tiny bit. The so-called "drift velocity" of
conduction electrons in a current-carrying wire is only about 1 cm/sec. It
is not, as many people think, the speed of light.

73,
Jim W8ZR

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>