That's PEP, so more like 1000W average input. I've been using it for
5 years now during the summer Sporadic E season and no problems so far.
- Paul
At 12:14 PM 12/6/2016, Richard Solomon wrote:
1,300 Watts out at ~ 65% efficiency
equates to 2,000 Watts input.
Better save your nickels for that new
power xfmr you will soon need !!
I have heard these tales before of
folks claiming upwards of 1,500 Watts
out on an SB-220.
I file them away along with the photo's
I took of the Loch Ness Monster.
73 es HH, Dick, W1KSZ
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com> wrote:
> I run an SB220 modified for 6M (single band). 1300W PEP out.
>
> - Paul
>
> At 09:13 AM 12/6/2016, Richard Solomon wrote:
>
>> I would think the efficiency on 6
>> would be rather poor.
>>
>> Three tubes in parallel ??
>>
>> 73 es HH, Dick, W1KSZ
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > At 05:16 AM 12/6/2016, you wrote:
>> >
>> >> ## legal limit here in canada is 2250 w pep out... measured at the
>> ant.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > An even better reason than "the Donald" to move to Canada.
>> >
>> > My ideal amp would be and automated 3 x 3-500Z, 160m to 6m. $500 total
>> for
>> > brand new replacement tubes.
>> >
>> > - Paul
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Amps mailing list
>> > Amps@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|