Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] LDMOS and DMOS RF MOSFETs

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] LDMOS and DMOS RF MOSFETs
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 04:23:27 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I was under the impression that Si based transistors would handle higher temperatures than GaN.

Is there something that will handle more than 300 W output that isn't pulsed and can handle CW and SSB in a linear mode? That something needs to be cost efficient enough not to require a second mortgage.

73, Roger (K8RI)


On 5/4/2017 3:24 AM, John Lyles wrote:
This was on line, dated 2014. An interesting perspective on LDMOS and plain DMOS transistors.
73
John
K5PRO
----------
Reports of the Death of DMOS RF MOSFETs are Greatly Exaggerated
by Mark Vitellaro, Director of Strategic Marketing, Richardson RFPD


The landscape of the RF power transistor market has recently changed due primarily to three developments: the emergence of GaN, the maturation of the LDMOS process, and the slowdown in the growth of the wireless infrastructure market. The performance attributes of GaN are well known. The technology offers a highly-valued combination of improved power density, high gain, high frequency, wide bandwidth, and high efficiency. Another interesting aspect of the emergence of GaN has been the appearance of multiple independent GaN fabs, which has opened up opportunities for several RF transistor companies that were previously unable to develop their own competitive LDMOS strategy. While there is certainly time for the GaN market to consolidate, there seems to be enough diversification in product development to support several players in the medium term. It just so happens that the timing of the GaN awakening has occurred as LDMOS is facing challenges from a maturing process, as well as the shrinking of the wireless infrastructure market. Now dominated by Freescale, NXP and Infineon, LDMOS is on its 9th generation, providing diminishing marginal returns from future process enhancements. Furthermore, the push for higher efficiency, digital baseband with digital predistortion and small cells in the wireless market have reduced the LDMOS dollars per amplifier. The combination of these forces has driven LDMOS suppliers to look elsewhere for growth, and the largest area of interest has been the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) market. This market is fragmented and includes many high power HF applications such as RF exciters for CO2 laser, RF generators for plasma ignition, and RF amplifiers for MRI. Historically these applications have been served by RF MOSFETs.

But the current generation of LDMOS was not suitable for ISM, because the evolution of LDMOS has been driven primarily by the needs of the wireless market—which has a completely different set of technical requirements. So Freescale and NXP went back to the drawing board. Freescale was the first to plant their flag with their “E” series of enhanced rugged LDMOS. The new feature set included a very high VSWR rating of 65:1 at all phase angles, coupled with a 3 dB overdrive feature. Combining those features with their 50V process and wide gate withstand voltage introduced a new class of transistor that was suited for the high mismatch applications of the ISM market. What’s more, Freescale introduced a 1.25kW device that could be operated single-ended or push-pull. This new class of transistors set the ISM market on its head. Up until this point, most systems were based on combined 300W DMOS transistors which required extensive passive matching and combining networks. The 1.25kW LDMOS device simplified the architecture and eliminated significant supportive circuitry. Furthermore, as the efficiency of these circuits were approaching 80%, it was possible to utilize surface mount devices. It didn’t take long for NXP to notice, and shortly thereafter, it introduced its family of “XR” Extra Rugged, RF transistors. The family looked similar on paper, as they included a 65:1 VSWR rating and 1.2kW and 1.4kW device. But even more telling was the 2013 announcement from NXP to close a fab that produced many RF transistors, including their DMOS products that were optimized for HF/ISM applications. Freescale had already exited the DMOS market more than a decade ago when they divested their gold process fab and sold that product line to M/A-COM Technology Solutions, which continues to produce the line of MRF transistors in their Lowell fab today.

So now you may be asking yourself, “Wait, this blog post began on the premise the DMOS was not dead, didn’t it? It sounds like DMOS is declining as LDMOS encroaches into their market only to be accelerated further now that both Freescale and NXP are focused on transitioning customers to LDMOS technology...” Clearly LDMOS has taken share and the suppliers are allocating more resources to support the ISM market as wireless slows, but the remaining DMOS suppliers are not throwing in the towel just yet. As a process technology it would seem that DMOS has reached its process limits, but there are incremental improvements that can be made specifically to address the ISM market, namely packaging innovations, higher voltage, and the pulse characteristics of DMOS. ST Microelectronics was the first to develop a plastic air cavity package as an alternative to costly ceramic packages. Introduced as “STAC” packaging, which stands for ST Air Cavity, they successfully eliminated the ceramic, which reduced cost and improved thermal dissipation and gain. Presently available in bolt-down and direct-solder options, several established DMOS transistors are now available in the new packaging. Microsemi also developed their own packaging enhancement. The flangeless VRF157FL is a near equivalent to the 600W MRF157, but Microsemi removed the CuW flange and replaced the ceramic lid with plastic. These mechanical changes result in similar benefits as the STAC, and hopefully that family grows as much as it has with ST Micro.

Besides packaging, increasing the supply voltage from 50V can simplify and shrink the power supply and thus the overall system. In addition to a smaller power supply, RF amplifiers for MRI benefit from better SNR, which can improve the quality of the imaging. ST and Microsemi both have 100V conventional DMOS in their portfolio, the SD3933 and VRF3933. ST also has a STAC version, the STAC3933. But Microsemi has gone even further with their ARF family of DMOS transistors which operate at 150V and 250V. These plastic packaged devices operate in highly efficient Class D mode and are offered in pairs or with integrated drivers (DRF1200). ST is developing their own 150V to 250V “Super Junction” DMOS devices, which are in evaluation now.

Finally, DMOS exhibits a much higher peak power rating compared to an equivalently sized LDMOS device. Combining that peak power advantage with a plastic/flangeless package narrows the cost advantage of LDMOS. For instance the STAC3932B is characterized for 3T MRI systems. Under 1mS, 10% conditions, the part will produce 900W peak power. In conclusion, the combination of inherent characteristics of DMOS and the hard work of innovating suppliers show that the incumbent DMOS manufacturers refuse to concede victory to LDMOS. And the ultimate end users of ISM transistors are very resistant to change and are not always impressed with the next new thing. “Copy Exact” requirements and fear of the unknown will ensure a portion of the ISM market continues to use DMOS. I, for one, welcome the debate and am curious to see how this battle plays out. While everyone else is enthralled with GaN, the LDMOS – DMOS battle will be a very interesting one to follow.

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>