Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 8877 filament.

To: Amps group <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 filament.
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 20:24:38 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Thu, 4 May 2017 18:46:44 +0000, AB9GO wrote:

>.  It worked as you described, but tube life was reduced due to cathode 
>poisoning. 

REPLY:

I disagree in the case of TV tubes. 

I did TV repair for 20 years back in the 50's through the 70's and saw
no evidence of tube life being reduced due to cathode poisoning.
Nearly all tube failures in TVs were due to either internal shorts or
opens or gas. In all those years and thousands of tube replacements I
can't remember even one case of simple low emission. 

But I agree in the case of an 8877, a far different tube from a
receiving tube and it may be different. I wouldn't risk it. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>