1. Jim, you said "all communication is via the internet," but in the
quote from Gerald below, he said "ethernet." There is a big difference
since local ethernet is very fast, while the internet would introduce a
long latency period. I think you meant to write "ethernet?"
2. He said "The relays are rated for a maximum contact bounce of 7 ms.
That plus some time to control the relay we allow for 10 ms. This is on
the order of the fastest transceiver key down to RF out."
No it isn't. The K3 can have as little as 4.5 ms (QRQ mode, per N6TV,
who measured it) and normally allows just 8 ms. It can be set for longer
delay, but that affects the keying.
Your comment about saving a few bucks in a $7K amplifier is on target.
73,
Victor, 4X6GP
Rehovot, Israel
Formerly K2VCO
CWops no. 5
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
On 30/10/2018 16:48, Jim Garland wrote:
There has been considerable discussion on this group and elsewhere about
the forthcoming FlexRadio Power Genius XL high-end solid state
amplifier. Some of us, myself included, have wondered about the new
amp's CW performance, especially after learning that it uses plastic
enclosed open frame relays, rather than vacuum relay or PIN diode T/R
switching. I wrote Flex CEO Gerald K5SDR questions about the new amp's
CW performance, and received the response below. Two interesting tidbits
are that when using a Flex transceiver with the amp, there is no control
cable between it and the transceiver. Both plug into the internet and
all communication is via the internet. (Also, Flex transceivers time
shift CW as it's sent to allow any other brand of amp to come on-line
gracefully and to eliminate any potential latency. I don't believe other
transceivers have this capability.) In addition, on CW the amplifier
achieves about 70 percent efficiency, which allows it to run cooler than
most solid state amps, thus allowing less fan noise.
73,
Jim W8ZR
Hi Jim,
Thanks so much for your questions and your interest in Power Genius XL.
I asked the engineering team and their answers are provided in the text
below.
73,
Gerald
Gerald Youngblood, K5SDR
President and CEO
FlexRadio Systems(TM)
Email: gerald@flexradio.com <mailto:gerald@flexradio.com>
Web: www.flexradio.com <http://www.flex-radio.com/>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
**
Dear Gerald,
I and my friends have been reading with great interest the updates on
your new amp, and very much appreciate them. However, we do have a few
questions about the amp's CW performance. It seems like a great deal of
effort has gone into making the Power Genius XL an excellent SO2R
amplifier, but I and my CW buddies are particularly interested in how
the amplifier works on CW. As I'm sure you know, CW operators are vastly
more numerous than SO2R operators, and many of them are curious about
the new amplifier's CW performance. Looking at general contest
participation (e.g., the CQ WW DX contests). there are many more CW
participants than SSB/Digital participants, and nearly all of these
participants are using amplifiers.
*Let me first state that Power Genius was designed by a CW op for XW
ops. 4O3A is a top CW operator and has been running the amp in CW
contests in Montenegro. In CW mode, the amplifier operates near 70%
efficiency based on the Maximum Efficiency Algorithm (Meffa).*
Here are the questions:
1. The PG-XL evidently doesn't run QSK, which isn't a problem for the
majority of CW operators who don't use QSK. However most of us (myself
included) use a very short drop-out time when running semi-break-in (for
me typically 150 msec), which can cause a lot of relay clicking of an
amplifier's T/R relays. That raises the issue of reliability, which in
turn leads to questions about relay sequencing and hot-switching. Does
the PG-XL sequence its T/R relays to prevent hot-switching? For some
transceivers, it is possible to set the TX Delay time long enough to let
the amp's relays close before it receives RF, but many transceivers do
not have this feature. For those operators, how is hot-switching
prevented, and more generally, how does the amplifier handle relay
sequencing? The proper sequence is to close the output relay first, then
turn on the operating bias, and lastly close the input relay.
*While PG-XL is not designed for full QSK, it is designed for fast
switching times as low as 10 ms. **We do NOT hot switch the relays. The
amplifier also provides an inhibit output that can be used with some
radios that provide for that capability. This is not needed with
FlexRadio since all control and inhibit commands are sent over Ethernet.*
**2. The operating manual stipulates a 20 msec TX Delay time, which
isn't a problem for, e.g., the FLEX 6000 series, which "remembers"
whatever is sent during the first 20 msec and time-shifts the CW so that
no dits are shortened. Most transceivers don't do this, however, so that
whatever is sent during the first 20 msec is lost. With a 20 msec TX
Delay and a short dropout time, this could lead to shortened or lost
dits on almost every word or sentence. Is your engineering team aware of
this potential problem, and if so how does the amplifier deal with it?
I'm sure you know that 20 msec is a very long TX Delay time for CW
operation.
*The current recommended transmit delay is 20 ms but we will drop that
to 10-12 ms soon subject to further testing. **For FlexRadio only, this
added delay is about to go away and will be incorporated into the
handshake interchange, so any transmit delay is transparent to the
customer. For Flex radios only, the radio delays the start of the CW
transmission, so no leading CW elements are lost. **For other brands of
radios, we will soon see a shortening to less than 15 ms. Other brands
of radios are not as sophisticated as to delay the transmit stream.*
3. Much PG-XL discussion on the air centers around the fact that the
PG-XL uses open-frame, plastic-encased DPDT relays for T/R switching
instead of PIN diodes or vacuum relays. This is a curious choice for a
$7000 amplifier and an important issue for potential buyers, who believe
that general purpose relays have significant contact bounce, slow
closing and opening times, experience arcing at the contacts if hot
switched, and are noisier than vacuum relays or (completely silent) PIN
diodes. How does FlexRadio address these concerns?
*The relays are rated for a maximum contact bounce of 7 ms. That plus
some time to control the relay we allow for 10 ms. This is on the order
of the fastest transceiver key down to RF out. As stated above, the
relays are not hot switched. The relays are rated for 10 million
mechanical cycles. You can see the Finder 40.52 specification sheet
attached. Contacts are AgNi.*
3. Who is advising your design team about the amplifier's CW operation?
The CW deficiencies of the Flex 1500 series are well known, and these
were entirely eliminated in the Flex Signature 6000 series, which are
fabulous CW transceivers. It's important to the CW community that this
same design care be carried over to the PowerGenius, so it would be
helpful to know how your design team involved the CW community in
designing the amplifier.
*Primarily 4O3A and K9CT. There are many others on the alpha team as
well who are CW contesters.*
4. Fan noise is a big problem with solid state amplifiers, especially
with muffin-type fans which tend to have an irritating higher-pitched
sound than, e.g., squirrel cage blowers. The Elecraft KPA-1500 is often
criticized because of its whiny fan noise when running full output. Can
you explain how the PG-XL deals with this issue? A related issue is
relay clicking noise, which many CW operators find bothersome,
especially those who don't habitually wear headphones.
*We have significantly improved fan noise beginning with firmware 2.8.7
or later. CW mode operates at 70% efficiency and a fairly low duty
cycle compared to RTTY and FT8 so fans typically will remain on the
lowest speed in most CW operation.*
Thanks very much Gerald, for considering my questions. I and my
buddies are eagerly looking forward to leaerning more about your new
amplifier.
73,
Jim W8ZR
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|