[Top] [All Lists]

[antennaware] Efficiency and losses

To: <>
Subject: [antennaware] Efficiency and losses
From: (Gary Breed)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:56:24 -0400
I am trying to quantify the efficiency of trapped h.f. antennas
references tell me that -traps are lossy and trapped antennas are
inefficient.I cant find a reference to the typical efficiency, is it
20% ,40% or is it 90%?

Roger G3MGW



A former commercial amateur antenna designer told me to use 
1/10 dB per trap as a "rule of thumb" for well-designed traps. 

Using this number, an A-3 tribander has 12 traps in the circuit 
on 20 meters, and would be 1.2 dB down.  The losses are also 
compounded by the parasitic elements.  For example, 4/10 dB 
loss in a reflector results in more than 4/10 dB lost gain (but I'm
not sure how much).

Maybe Steve at Cushcraft or Roger at  Hy-Gain can shed some
more light on the matter. A reliable number for trap resistance 
would be very useful for modeling.

Some older designs will have greater loss.  My one-sample
personal experience is the replacement of an old Moseley
Classic 33 with a Hy-Gain Explorer 14 -- the improvement
was astonishing. The older Moseley had directivity, which
indicated that it was working OK, but between the traps,
tuning and feed design, it was barely better than a dipole.

Gary, K9AY

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>