CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Two TX

Subject: Two TX
From: hwardsil@seattleu.edu (Ward Silver)
Date: Fri Jul 9 13:54:46 1993
I don't have any problem with the following sequence:

Band A:    CQCQCQ --listen-- CQCQCQ --response--exchange--
Band B:             CQCQCQ  -listen- CQ(abort)-----------CQCQCQ

It works for multi-single, too...

I do have a problem with:

Bankd A:   CQCQCQ --listen-- CQCQCQ --response, etc.
Bankd B:   CQCQCQ --listen-- CQCQCQ ----------------

(bankd?)
Scenario #1 is just skill and being able to keep two things straight at once.
(should be no problem for parents with small children...)  Scenario #2 is
not skill, but rather brute force.

I think Tree's rule change addresses the use and abuse of scenario #2, with
which I agree.

Ward, N0AX

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Two TX, Ward Silver <=