CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

ARRL RTTY Roundup

Subject: ARRL RTTY Roundup
From: bogus@does.not.exist.com (bogus@does.not.exist.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 16:10:24 1994
1994 ARRL RTTY Roundup

WS7I Single Operator - Low Power - Montana

      Band      Qso     Mult
        80       59       2
        40      175       5
        20      361      38
        15      216      22
        10      149      32
     =============================
                960      99

      22 Dupes or Non-counters.

                938 X 99 = 92,862 Claimed.

Operated from Ken Kopp's estate (K0PP).  Antnennas 1/4 Vertical and
double extended Zepp on 80, 2el 40 @ 100, Kt24XA @ 75, 3el Tribander
@ 75.  Used Yaesu FT1000 and the AEA PK232 with Hal ST6000 unit.

-- 
Jay Townsend, Ws7i  < jayt@comtch.iea.com >



-- 
Jay Townsend, Ws7i  < jayt@comtch.iea.com >


>From rking@sescva.esc.edu (RICHARD KING - K5NA)  Sat Jan 15 00:57:27 1994
From: rking@sescva.esc.edu (RICHARD KING - K5NA) (RICHARD KING - K5NA)
Subject: Texas Hwy. 290?

I'm not 100% sure, but my guess would be that you saw the site of NR5M.  I 
have never been there (I been gone from Texas DX Society territory for 14 
years now), but that is approximately where NR5M should be.

73, Richard

>From Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM>  Sat Jan 15 01:37:48 1994
From: Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM> (Trey Garlough)
Subject: Texas Hwy. 290?
Message-ID: <758597868.900000.GARLOUGH@TGV.COM>

> I'm not 100% sure, but my guess would be that you saw the site of NR5M.  I 
> have never been there (I been gone from Texas DX Society territory for 14 
> years now), but that is approximately where NR5M should be.

NR5M is on 290 just west of Hempstead, Texas.

--Trey, WN4KKN/6

>From geoiii@bga.com (George Fremin III - WB5VZL)  Sat Jan 15 07:21:05 1994
From: geoiii@bga.com (George Fremin III - WB5VZL) (George Fremin III)
Subject: arrl rtty scores
Message-ID: <9401150721.AA24733@wixer>

            1994 RTTY Roundup
                H/C Scores
 
  Call     Qso's    Mults    Score     Power
 
                Single Op.
 KP2N     1225       92      122k       High
 WA7EGA   1060      100      106k       High
 WA7AVD   1024      101      103k       High
 AB5KD     998       99       98k       High
 NV1G      905      104       94k       High
 WF5T      850       90       76k       High
 WF5E      737       85       62k       High
 NN2G      623       92       57k       High
 NO2T      523      106       55k       High
 K1IU      653       82       53k       High
 N6GG      590       88       51k       High
 WB6SDM    549       75       41k       High
 K2TW      446       92       41k       High
 WB2EAR    495       73       36k       High
 WF1B      400       69       29k       High
 NA4M      215       40        8k       High
 
 WS7I      938       99       92k       Low
 C6A/AA5AU 703       82       57k       Low
 K7GS      374       84       31k       Low
 NY2U      290       60       17k       Low
 W6/G0AZT  261       63       16k       Low
 KU4A      211       59       12k       Low
 N2LBS      93       ?         3k       Low
 
                Multi/Single
 K9RS       1046      102    106k       High
 VP5/WA0VQR 1030       90     93k       Low
 N1JEB       359       68     24k       Low
 
     After all RTTY Test's H/C Scores are
     taken on 14088 by WS7I, on 7088 by
     AB5KD, both on FSK...
 
     Tnx to all that sent or posted your
     scores. When I get more scoresI'll
     post them.
 
     Send your RTTY H/C Scores to:
     Via-Internet- ron481@austin.relay.ucm.org
     Via-Packet-   ab5kd @ n5ljf.#aus.usa.na
 
     Send Logs to: ARRL RTTY ROUNDUP
                   225 Main St.
                   Newington, CT 06111
     ((Roundup logs must be postmarked by:8-Feb-94))
 
         CU in the pile,
              73's
           de Ron AB5KD
 

-- 

George Fremin III
Austin, Texas C.K.U.                        
WB5VZL
512/416-0140
geoiii@bga.com

>From Randy A Thompson <K5ZD@world.std.com>  Sat Jan 15 15:08:43 1994
From: Randy A Thompson <K5ZD@world.std.com> (Randy A Thompson)
Subject: VHF Rover Rules
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9401151023.A24774-0100000@world.std.com>

I am against the recent release regarding changes to the ARRL VHF Contest 
Rover category.

Rovers should be eligible for Club scores.  These guys work hard.  They 
contribute to everyone's score and the overall contest activity (the 
reason the category was instituted).  There is no reason I can see as to 
why they should not be allowed to count toward the Club (the 175 mile 
rule not withstanding).

There is also no reason to overly complicate the rules to eliminate the 
practice of multiple rovers travelling together and working each other.  
Sure, there was an entry that exploited this to make an incredible 
score.  Yes, it's not real fair to the rest of the "legitimate" 
competitors.  But, imagine how many rules we would have to have to cover 
every conceivable act by people during the contest.

I would prefer to let peer pressure discourage this type of silly entry.  
Besides, imagine how boring it must have been for these guys to circle around 
the block 
working each other.  Get a life!

73,

Randall A. Thompson, K5ZD

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>