In a message dated 96-08-08 03:02:07 EDT, you write:
>
> We based our comments on
>the best available medical evidence and urged the FCC to
>follow what we believed to be the right course of action on
>this (most members of that committee were medical doctors
>with a professional interest in RF safety as a health issue).
>
That's interesting.
I wonder if the opinions from your group were based on repeatable scientific
evidence, or conclusions reached from review of uncontrolled data bases?
Physicians that have worked testing the effects of RF Medical devices assure
me that there is no cause for alarm, unless the RF exposure level is close to
the amount necessary to cause heating. Their opinions come from years of
intention RF exposure to lab animals in a controlled environment.
73 Tom
>From w6go@netcom.com (Jay O'Brien - W6GO) Thu Aug 8 18:25:24 1996
From: w6go@netcom.com (Jay O'Brien - W6GO) (Jay O'Brien - W6GO)
Subject: RF and Litigation exposure
Message-ID: <199608081725.KAA17160@netcom21.netcom.com>
New industries and products created by the RF exposure rule?
1. Insurance policies offering legal defense against RF exposure suits.
2. A computer-driven program which reduces transmit power to 50W when
RF density levels are exceeded in a unit of time, using antenna
pattern, antenna heading and power output sampling as part of the
calculation. (This is NOT likely to be "shareware"!)
3. Sampling and control hardware to support the above computer program.
4. Power density measurement service, including certification.
See what good this is doing? It is government creating jobs. These new
jobs will improve our quality of life about as much as do tax accountants
and estate trust creators, also folks whose industries were created by
government decree rather than by consumer demand.
73, Jay
w6go@netcom.com
>From tree@lady.axian.com (Larry Tyree) Thu Aug 8 18:32:05 1996
From: tree@lady.axian.com (Larry Tyree) (Larry Tyree)
Subject: SprINT contest THIS WEEKEND!!
Message-ID: <199608081732.KAA04404@lady.axian.com>
ELEVENTH INTERNET CW SPRINT CONTEST
Contest period: 01:00:00Z to 03:00:00Z on Sunday August 11th UTC. This
is Saturday evening in the USA.
Bands: 40 and 20 meters only (this is a real radio contest, no internet).
Suggested frequencies are 7030-7050 and 14030-14050.
Max power output: 150 watts at transmitter output connector.
Exchange: Consecutive QSO number (starting with one), name and state
or province or DXCC country (if outside W/VE). The name for
the first QSO is your name. For every QSO afterwards, the name
you send is the name you received in the previous QSO.
Call: CQ INT
The standard sprint QSY rule must be followed. This means that if you
solict a QSO (ie: with CQ or QRZ), after completing the QSO, you must
QSY at least 1 kHz before calling another station, or 5 kHz before
solicting another QSO.
Both callsigns must be sent during the exchange. Only one signal at a
time please and all QSOs are to take place on CW. All information
submitted must have been decoded during the contest. The use of post
contest detection or verification techniques or systems is not allowed.
Also, do not make round robin type QSOs. It will be very easy to spot
these with the names floating around. A round robin QSO is one where
you should QSY, but instead hang around to work the station who is
QSOing the station you gave the frequency to.
You may work the same station multiple times provided they are separated
by at least 3 other QSOs in both logs (regardless of band). For example,
if WN4KKN works N6TR, KKN must work at least 3 other stations before he
can work TR again. TR must also work 3 stations before working KKN
again. Changing bands does not eliminate the three QSO requirement.
The three QSOs must not be dupes themselves.
You must not work the same station or stations using any kind of schedule
or system. It is the intent of the dupe rule to make sure we don't run out
of stations to work. It is NOT the intent of this rule for you to change how
you would operate the contest if dupes were not allowed. If, in the log
checkers opinion, you have not lived up to the intent of this rule, your
log will be disqualified!!
Total score is the number of contacts you make. Any QSO found to be
defective in anyway will be removed from both logs (yes, if someone
miscopies your exchange, you won't get credit for the QSO, so QRS a
bit!!).
Please refrain from using vulgar or inappropriate names. If you receive
one of these names, feel free to either edit it or replace it with your
starting name. Make sure to make a note in your log so we know what you did.
Injecting the contest with an inappropriate name (in the log checker's
opinion) will result in a 1000 point penalty per occurrence. Examples of
inappropriate names may be found on MTV and generally start with the
letter "B".
Additional penalties will be assessed to people who work a significant number
of QSOs, but don't turn a log in. They will be given minus one point
for each QSO that we can verify actually occurred.
Logs must be sent in ASCII format via internet to n6tr@contesting.com within
72 hours of the end of the contest. Figuring out how to send in your
log on the internet is PART OF THE CONTEST. If you need help, we will
try to assist the best we can.
Logs must show the band, time, station worked, number sent, number received,
name received and QTH received for each QSO. Also, please tell me the
name you start the contest with. We will assume the name you send is the
name received on your previous QSO, so you don't have to show that.
Results will be publised on CQ-CONTEST within 2 weeks of the contest. Logs
are checked using the K2MM LogZap software system. All checked logs will
be made available by FTP except for those requested by the submitter to
be kept private. Decisions of the judging committe are final and arbitrary.
Good luck, tell a friend and HAVE FUN!!
Tree N6TR
tree@contesting.com
>From tgeorgen@ppdpost.ks.symbios.com (Georgens, Tom) Thu Aug 8 18:37:00 1996
From: tgeorgen@ppdpost.ks.symbios.com (Georgens, Tom) (Georgens, Tom)
Subject: Freds' fables
Message-ID: <320A2671@ppdgtway.ks.symbios.com>
>
The date was May 20. The year was 2046. Four days earlier, the
Forces of Evil had detonated a massive thermonuclear weapon high
above the Kansas countryside,
>
Thanks for the warning Fred. I just relocated to Kansas so I will be sure
to
leave the state that day.
73, Tom W2SC
tom.georgens@symbios.com
|