I found the ARRL information at the following URL:
IT should also be available on the ARRL BBS.
Thanks to all who helped out. See you in the 'tests!
AA7NX (for now...)
>From email@example.com (Bill Turner) Sat Oct 5 02:05:54 1996
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill Turner) (Bill Turner)
Subject: PACKET CHEATING
On Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:38:23 +0100, Andrew@gi0nwg.demon.co.uk wrote:
>My vote goes for combining SO and SOA. Then there can be no accusations
>of cheating, at least in this area of the rules.
If we're taking votes, I vote for eliminating SOA altogether and making =
Multi-Op again. Isn't that what it really is? Another op assisting you?=
me, single op means just one, period.
73, Bill W7LZP
>From HWDX09A@prodigy.com ( ROBERT REED) Sat Oct 5 02:58:07 1996
From: HWDX09A@prodigy.com ( ROBERT REED) ( ROBERT REED)
Subject: ARRL E-mail Responces
It's interesting to see the comments regarding what ARRL employees
respond to your e-mail questions and those that don't.
I earlier this week sent a message to Dave Sumner regarding the fact
that messages to K5FUV and the DXCC Desk never are replied to or even
acknowledged. I often send in messages sent to me from DX stations
wanting their DX information included in W1AW DX Bulletins. Because I
post the bulletins to the DX Reflector the DXers use me as a
On the other hand, I always get immediate replies from contest@arrl.
org usually by Tom Hogerty and from email@example.com from Billy himself.
There are others I regular write to in the VEC, RIB, and Membership
Services areas that all respond within the day.
Some people may want to do as I have recently started doing and that
is to CC to firstname.lastname@example.org on every message I send to ARRL
destinations where the replies usually don't come back. My recent
message regarding the DXCC Desk was reeived by Dave and forwarded
onto K8CH for a responce which I am still waiting for but can at
least quote a K1ZZ message that it was routed for a responce.
While I respect Dave and would normally not run to the head of every
company I deal with, employees at ARRL HQ must keep in mind they are
all employees of a membership organization supported by our funds and
are to service our requests. Got a bitch with a customer ? Tough luck,
as the saying goes, the customer is always right and deserves
respect of an answer. Especially if he's wrong and needs an
73, Bob Reed, WB2DIN
1991 Route 37 West - Lot 109
Toms River, New Jersey 08757
Internet : email@example.com
Packet : firstname.lastname@example.org
>From email@example.com (David L. Thompson) Sat Oct 5 01:57:30 1996
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (David L. Thompson) (David L. Thompson)
Subject: CT CTY file redux
I still have no answer as to where...someone must know.
I have had 11 requests for me too so It not well know!
BTW: I meant N6RJ not N4RJ. N4RJ is alive and well!
>From email@example.com (Art Wallace) Sat Oct 5 03:19:45 1996
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Art Wallace) (Art Wallace)
Subject: Kenwood - A Final Final on Truck Stops
A Final Final on Kenwood and Truck Stops / CB Outlets
Yesterday I had a lengthy conversation with Paul Middlefield KD6NUH,
National Sales Manager for Kenwood, concerning the rumor that they
would be selling Amateur Radio equipment in places such as Truck Stops
and CB outlets. Nothing could be further from the truth. Here is
Kenwoods side and what they are doing.
Somehow the rumor got started, it was printed in QST and even a letter
from a ham stating this was going to happen. Not even close to the
truth per Kenwood.
First, why should Kenwood start another distribution channel? Kenwood
has 18 states with no dealers, 24 states with only one dealer. That
leaves 8 states with 2 or more dealers. Not a very good channel of
distribution. In a survey of 2500 new hams, 1/3 didn't buy a radio, 1/3
bought from Kenwood, Icom, Yaesu and Alinco, the remaining 1/3 bought
from Radio Shack with over 7,000 stores. This means Kenwood, Icom,
Yaesu and Alinco are competing for 1/3 of the new ham business.
Solution: They have established Master Distributors who are Amateur
Radio operators and it is their responsibility to screen other Amateurs
who would like to open up their own business or add to their own
business as sales and service. Only those qualified need apply. We have
recently had a Kenwood outlet open here in the North County of San
Diego, sales and service, and it has been welcome by all the local
Paul assured me that Kenwood is in this market strictly for Amateur
Radio and they are doing everything in their power to see that their
radios stay in proper channels of distribution. If you would like to
send Paul E-Mail with any questions or comments, his address is
email@example.com . Also, see their home page WWW.Kenwood.Net for
more on this and what they are doing.
This is the kind of damage that unfounded rumors can cause and I
appologize for adding to it. Sometimes what seems funny to one person,
becomes fact to another and ends up causing others a lot of grief.
73, Art KK6XN Waiting for my Atlas Radio and my 1x2
>From firstname.lastname@example.org (John Warren) Sat Oct 5 03:29:08 1996
From: email@example.com (John Warren) (John Warren)
Subject: ARRL E-mail Responses
Bob WB2DIN wrote:
|It's interesting to see the comments regarding what ARRL employees
|respond to your e-mail questions and those that don't.
|... messages to K5FUV and the DXCC Desk never are replied to or even
I can't explain this, but in fairness I must report that answers from the
DXCC section to my very occasional e-mails have been exceptionally prompt.
The last two were each answered in less than one hour. I never bother them
with questions about routine processing status, and also I search all other
conceivable leads to information before going to "the source". But probably
you met those requirements too Bob, in which case I just don't know. Bill K
told me once how many e-mails arrive daily - I've forgotten, but it was
some awesome number.
73, John, NT5C.
>From firstname.lastname@example.org (Dan Robbins) Sat Oct 5 04:55:43 1996
From: email@example.com (Dan Robbins) (Dan Robbins)
Subject: Kenwood Sales Manager
At 01:47 PM 10/4/96 -0400, AG7M wrote:
>Well this whole issue has caused me to decide two things:
>1. Unsubscribe from this reflector since there is so little exchange of info
>related to its title. (Trey son unsubscribe me or remind me how)
>2. Buy that new TS870.
OK, you can leave the reflector. But when that nasty old fishing boat or
long haul trucker QRMs SU2MT on 3795 (in a contest, of course) with HIS
TS-870 you relenquish your right to bitch.
>From firstname.lastname@example.org (Jay O'Brien - W6GO) Sat Oct 5 05:16:19 1996
From: email@example.com (Jay O'Brien - W6GO) (Jay O'Brien - W6GO)
Subject: QST writeup of CQP rules
The October QST, on page 101, refers to a "10-minute rule" for
multi-single entries in the CQP.
Anyone know what this particular "10-minute rule" really is? I can't
find it in the official NCCC rules.
>From G.DAUGHT@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU (George Daughters) Sat Oct 5 07:04:41
From: G.DAUGHT@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU (George Daughters) (George Daughters)
Subject: ct/icom737 hamview cable
kim, kn6yu, is trying to get his icom 737 to
work with ct 9.2? in time for CQP.
he has used "hamview products" rigview/logview/packview
which talk successfully to his 737, using hamview's
comport/radio interface cable.
ct can't seem to do it though... "radio timeout"
*although sometimes* ct picks up the correct frequency
from the radio... (but won't follow or cause band
has anyone ever made the combination
486/hamview cable/ic737 work together? any hints?
please email me directly, and i'll call kim tomorrow
morning if and when the mongo pileups resulting from my
cq-ing start to die down.
mega-thanks es 73