In a message dated 96-10-11 18:15:55 EDT, firstname.lastname@example.org (Steven
<< Am I dupe? I think not. The rules dont seem to address this. The
rules get less detailed every year!
This software shortcoming is what I am referring to. Can CT, TR, and NA be
modified to accomodate this? I wish to work guys over and over again.
What do you think?
de Hose KN5H
I think you are a dupe. The section is for multiplier credit only
73, Ken/KA5Q/6 soon to be ?6?? or K6KEN
>From email@example.com (Cleve D Leclair) Sat Oct 12 06:23:58 1996
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Cleve D Leclair) (Cleve D Leclair)
Subject: CW SS Logging/Mobile PLUS new question
Thought...If someone works k7tyu and the k7tyu moves to a different
section/state/?? then k7tyu would log as a "new" station..ie k7tyu/7.
And if he does not change then dupedupedupe. This will mean multipule(?)
logs...k7tyu/7, k7tyu/6, k7tyu/5...or k7tyu 599 ewa, k7tyu 599 or, k7tyu
599 ??? ... What I'm getting at is .."you will change we won't"
CT and NA should kick it as a dupe....
Cleve - N7IXG