In <199705262234.SAA10013@dayton.akorn.net>, on 05/25/97
at 09:12 PM, "Barry Martz K8BK" <dx@traverse.com> said:
>Add me to the list of guys who have trouble with the TAN etc number
>system. I will not submit my log because I don't know how many numbers
>I screwed up!
>Is it legal to copy ANTA for a number? That's what was sent! I think
>numbers should be sent for numbers.
The one exception to this that I think most if not all of us could live with
is sending the preceding zero as a "T" for the 1st 100 q's. After that I
think it's a big pain. After seeing it from this end maybe I'll have to rethink
sending "ATT" for "100" during the ARRL CW contest from Belize. What
is the collective wisdom on that, guys? Let me know privately & I'll post
a consensus message later.
73 - Alan NS0B
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Alan Braun MD, NS0B/V31EV *Internet: albraun@socketis.net *
* Jefferson City, MO *Packet: NS0B@N0LBA.#cemo.mo.usa.noam *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|