Spike Lazar wrote:
> Dear Dave,
>
> I'm afraid that any opinion by the members on this subject counts
> for very little. The league will do what it wants to do, regardless
> of any outcry from the CAC and membership.
>
> In this case, the message came from the league, came down to the CAC
> chairman and the CAC members and now down to the members. The purpose
> of inclusion of the 6 meters band into hf contesting is to expose
> no coders/tech plus operators to contesting.
>
> This is not an idea originating from the CAC Chairman or CAC members.
> Membership in the CAC is a thankless undertaking by dedicated contesters,
> who must enjoy self punishment and frustration. What you say about
overseas
> CAC has merit, and I wouldn't be surprised if any CAC member wouldn't
gladly
> give you their seat!
>
> 73, Spike W9XR
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
The idea stinks. Keep VHF contests VHF. Keep HF contests HF.
If enough people hammer the idea as being bad, then the ARRL will have a
hard time adopting it regardless of whether it is top down or bottom up.
73, Doug K4LT
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|