[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] 599 etc.

Subject: [CQ-Contest] 599 etc.
From: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
Date: Fri Jun 6 13:12:48 1997
On 6/5/97 2:48 PM, binkrote@bsi.att.com at binkrote@bsi.att.com wrote:

>Those of you that are proponents of dropping the RST as redundant may 
>have overlooked one small thing.  Most awards (WAS - DXCC etc.) need a 
>signal report on the QSL card. 

Signal report isn't required for WAS or DXCC (although it may have been 
at one time).

If a signal report is required on the QSL card, why would that make it a 
requirement as part of the (contest) QSO? I don't see how the two are 
tied together.

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@radio.org
Quote: "Not in a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>