CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest

Subject: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest
From: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
Date: Tue Sep 16 13:10:39 1997
On 9/15/97 16:29, James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil at 
James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil wrote:

>On the subject of "round-robin" qsos, this was beat around pretty
>well on the cq-contest reflector last year.  With no resolution,
>however.  Actually, the rule implies that if one does not solicit a qso,
>then one does not have to qsy.  A move IS required if one solicits a
>qso.  In practice, generally everyone moves after a maximum of two
>qsos on a frequency.  However, by the letter of the rule, unlimited
>qsos are possible on a frequency.

That's certain subject to a rather strict interpretation.

>As long as one is being called by
>other stations without soliciting, then one could keep the frequency
>and run the string.  I tried this once in the phone sprint, just to see
>what would happen, and it didn't go over very well with at least one
>other contestant at the time.  When this was brought up on the
>reflector, opinion was split, with some maintaining that holding a
>frequency and running violated the "spirit" or "intent" of the rules.  

I don't remember opinion being "Split." I ran into this behavior from a 
"W6" during one Sprint. He worked someone in "5" land, then I worked him, 
then I started calling CQ. He ragged all over me saying that it was his 
frequency, because he didn't "solicit" my call.

I didn't argue with him then, just QSYed and went on. But I did bring it 
up on the list. And opinion was overwhelming AGAINST this behavior.

You might split your hairs this way, but that's certainly not the spirit, 
intent or MEANING of the rules. 

>Also, the rule as stated in the RTTY Sprint announcement, is different
>than that stated in the NA CW and Phone Sprint announcement, in
>that the NA announcement states  "Once a station is required to qsy,
>that station is not allowed to make another qso on the vacated
>frequency until at least one subsquent qso is made on a new
>frequency . . .".  There is no such statement in the RTTY rules.  Also,
>the wording on the round robin is soft, i.e. it does not read as a strict
>prohibition, but just something that is discouraged.

Perhaps it isn't in the RTTY rules because people haven't flagrantly 
violated the rules in this manner, as they have in sprints in other 
modes. Don't look at it as a "soft" approval.



Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@radio.org
Quote: "Not in a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>