> I would not put 100% weight in checking against master.dta for 2 reasons:
>
> 1. the op already had that option of checking during the contest.
> 2. master.dta as it is is not what was on during the contest - it
> represents what was reported in earlier contests.
I wondered if some people weren't relying on on MASTER.DAT as I moved
back to Kansas from Oklahoma about 2 months ago. This was my first
SS, or any other contest, from Kansas and I had some that asked my
section a couple of times and one that seemed to want to argue that
it should be OK instead of KS! I found this rather amusing to say
the least.
> U log what U hear - not what is in master.dta
Precisely, except that my code ability is none to great but adequate
enough to allow me to work a few Q's in SS and Field Day every year.
> I would feel very wrong about post checking my log against master.dta with
> the idea of taking some type of log action.
> I understand you are not recommending it.
Just like taking a test, changed answers are often changed wrong.
73, de Nate >>
Packet | KA0RNY @ WF0A.#SCKS.KS.USA.NOAM | "If wires can be
Internet | ka0rny@midusa.net | connected in two
Location | Valley Center, KS USA EM17hs | different ways,
View yet another web page at: | the first way
http://homepage.netspaceonline.com/~ka0rny/ | blows the fuse!"
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>From Greg Clark" <g.w.clark@cummins.com Wed Nov 5 08:06:55 1997
From: Greg Clark" <g.w.clark@cummins.com (Greg Clark)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Log submittal/Problem
Message-ID: <199711051306.IAA08051@comet.eeg.cummins.com>
Hi Folks
I'm posting this to the reflector to see if others have had the same
experience.
I e-mailed my CQWW SSB log to the CQWW address as stated. I received a
conformation of receipt. I then received a pass-word that would allow me to go
and view my log as it was received. Well, here is where the problem is. I
can't read my log.
It was sent in as an ASCII attachment, both the log and the summary. When
viewed it looks like like it is encoded.
Is the attachement the problem??? Should the log and summary have been put in
the body of the message rather than as attachments??
I have asked this question to the questions@cqww.com address but have not
received a reply.
Any hints??
73/Greg
K9IG
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|