N4KG writes:
>Question:
>
>Why are the high scores (high power) listed last in the SS listings,
>under the low power scores, which are under the QRP scores?
>
>This results in the score listings (from top to bottom) falling from
>the high QRP score to low QRP score, then jumping up to the
>high low-power score down to the low low-power score, and
>finally jumping to the high high-power score ( THE SECTION
>WINNER in most cases) and down to the low high-power score.
>
>This hides the section winner somewhere in the middle of each listing.
>If the high power scores were listed first, followed by the low power
>scores, and finally the QRP scores, a more uniform listing by score
>would result. (Yes, I know there are exceptions, but the present
>system is VERY confusing and difficult to follow.)
>
>What does ARRL have against placing the winners at the TOP?
>
>de Tom N4KG
Tom,
The QRP winner *is* the winner, and is properly listed at the TOP
of the standings. (QRO is for sissies like me.)
73,
Hans, K0HB
(2nd place, High Power, MN Section)
"Second Place = First Loser"
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|