If you examine the 1997 results you will find that G4KIV was DQ'ed for
unverifiable QSO's (BOTH MODES). Is that info what your looking for?
% of score reduction can happen at a fast rate if it's a QSO removed that is
also
the only QSO with a multi. The % of number QSO's removed was also given in
CQ-Contest analysis but that was not what was presented by Timo - that might
be an important number in determining DQ.
73 Robert
----------
From: z.pitman@libertel.nl
To: timo.klimoff@kolumbus.fi
Cc: ccf@contesting.com; cq-contest@contesting.com; timo.pohjola@stip.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse
Hi Timo et al,
Isn't there a DQ-limit for this ? I remember in some contest if the
claimed score is 5% (or so) less then the claimed it resulted autoamtic
DQ.
73s
Zoli HA1AG
>I made a quick research of European multi-single scores. Of course,
>there is always a chance of typos, but it is interesting to see how
>much your final score can be lower than your claimed score - without
>disqualification.
<snip>
>
> "Top errors"
>
> LZ7M 42,6
> US0Q 36,2
> OL3A 31,3
> EU8T 27,1
<snip>
>
> 73, Timo OH1NOA
> (one of OF1AF/OH1AF)
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|