Hi Guys,
few days ago, I posted a message about something I find well related to
the Timo's analysis. Unluckyly the answers I got weren't devoted to clear
up my doubts.
Let me now be very straight to see if I can get something satisfactory:
1) Is it logical for a WWDX old time score, to mix records estabilished
before '92, when final scores were quite symilar to declared, with the
actual results, so consistently "trimmed", even for winners ?
2) A score, more than 30% decreased from declared, brings to a victory
but finally gets very close in numbers to other scores coming from
logs with much fewer mistakes....
Is it a sign of equity, or is it only politically correct ?
3) Now, for each "broken" qso, the penalty consist of a 3 QSO removal,
plus a final committee's "judgment".
Leaving untouched committees' final judgments' privilege, wouldn't
it be more proportioned to increase penaltyes as much as the found
mistakes increase (i.e. 3 removed up to 1% broken calls, 4 up to 2%
broken, and so on) ?
Thank You in advance for the explainations.
Vy 73,
Mauri I4JMY (one of IR4T)
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|