Well an overwhelming majority like the Mod. Only one reply said the
difference was hard to discern.
I have ordered one and can't wait to get it installed.
I am also signed up to the 1000mp list. I just wanted some feedback from
the contest community.
Thanks for the input.
Mike
W0MU
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>From Ron Stordahl" <ron.stordahl@digikey.com Thu Mar 11 16:25:08 1999
From: Ron Stordahl" <ron.stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call
Message-ID: <99Mar11.102823cst.27787@gatekeeper.digikey.com>
How about working him, asking for the call, and if you don't get it scratch
the Q. I think the number of scratches will be fairly low and I don't see
how you can be penalized for not having the Q in your log, but perhaps he
will be penalized for having the Q which is missing from yours. Obviously
this depends upon how the checking software deals with this.
Ron N5IN
-----Original Message-----
From: John T. Laney, III <K4BAI@worldnet.att.net>
To: Bill & Chris Shell <n6ws@msn.com>
Cc: K7LXC@AOL.COM <K7LXC@AOL.COM>; cq-contest@contesting.com
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRZ without giving call
>
>If you ask for the call AFTER the exchange as Bill, N6WS suggests, you
>may well be ignored, or not even heard as the offending CQer hits the F1
>button after you say or send your exchange. Probably it's best to ask
>for the call before giving your exchange. 73, John, K4BAI/8P9HT.
>
>
>--
>CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
>Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|