At 11:44 PM 4/7/1999 +0100, Rob VE4GV wrote:
>
>
>I've been monitoring the Ct-User mail regarding Digital Voice Keyers. As
>someone
>who enjoys phone contests, I'm interested in the contesting community
>reaction
>to the following opinion.
>
>Voice keyers seem to me to be an excellent addition to the contesters
>armamentarium.
>However, I often find that when things get really hectic and rates start to
>climb, they can
>become more of a liability than an asset. By that I mean that tonal
>inflection and speed of
>response are very important in pileup control. Voice keyers do not have the
>ability to
>vary speed very easily and they don't accent a letter very well when
>necessary . ( They
>also don't have the ability to say: the alpha bravo- stand by, delta bravo
>ONLY .
>
>I have a K1EA type card and do not use the alphanumeric generator because it
>sounds too
>mechanical. Sometimes I also get the feeling that people get turned off by
>working a
>machine rather than a live person. This is especially true in SS ( my
>favorite test) when
>snagging the casual op is very important.
>
>I'm interested to know if any of the more successful phone ops use it for
>more
>than as a CQ machine. Its great for that. My feeling is that if I've got to
>copy the call
>and acknowledge it, I'm halfway there anyway. I might as well say "W1ABC QSL
>thanks".
Rob, I had one very early on, and was fascinated by the phonetic voicing
capabilities. as a result I spent a lot of time trying to build voice
files that would string together and sound natural. My final, reluctant
conclusion was the same as yours -- but I wouldn't be without it, even if
just as a CQ machine. An often overlooked capability is the "backcopy"
function that lets you capture what just happened on the air for posterity.
It's really fun sometimes.
73, Pete N4ZR
Loud is good
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|