[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: Re: [CQ-Contest] Polling

Subject: Fwd: Re: [CQ-Contest] Polling
From: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Wed Feb 13 11:33:14 2002

Some excerpts from messages N4ZR and I exchanged last month...

>At 10:00 AM 1/10/2002 -0500, N4ZR wrote:
>>It's worth remembering that a poll of a little over 1000 people is
>>considered statistically representative of the entire adult population of
>>the United States, within +/- 3 percentage points.  You can imagine how
>>small a sample would give comparable results for the ham population of
>>700,000 or so.  That makes it pretty likely that very few contesters are in
>>the sample for any given QST reader poll. 
>The results of the last 3 ARRL Readex surveys have had error rates of 3.6, 3.6 
>and 3.5 points.   And yes, out of 160K members, 6K contesters won't be noticed 
>much (4%).   Of those ARRL members on this reflector (about 700?), the 
>percentage is more like 0.4%.  So of roughly 800 surveys returned, only three 
>might be from people on this reflector.
>                                -- Tom

e-mail: k1ki@arrl.org   ARRL New England Division Director  http://www.arrl.org/
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444

CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>