[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Strange cable lengths

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Strange cable lengths
From: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Sat Feb 23 19:17:00 2002

I modeled the scheme described in the link the Bill provided. When
you add the additional 50/75 ohm transformers on the antenna side,
the match gets much better (VSWR_ant = VSWR_ shack). I suspect
you may still pay a VSWR bandwidth penalty by using this scheme, but
I 'll have to do some additional modelling to confirm that. Sounds like
your friend only described half the system. It works much better with
the lines on both ends.

73 de Mike, W4EF............

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>; <marco.spalluzzi@orobiacom.it>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Strange cable lengths

> IK2XSL wrote
> >Why this lenghts?
> See Non-Synchronous balun described by K1XX:
> http://lists.contesting.com/_towertalk/199610/0276.html
> 73,  Bill  W4ZV
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>