We all know we should have an explanation we can ourselves
approve so we can look in the mirror post-results.
My two cents in this was for the 'world renowned'
Scandinavian Activity Contest, I have anounced an
Explanation Trophy !
Circulation Trophy was a success when it was launched
but in the following years the outcome has been a
clear decline in the amount of the explanations.
I did not have to circulate it in 2002 for 2001 result
explanations.
I do not know if that was good or bad development.
73,
Jukka, OH6LI
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext James Neiger [mailto:n6tj@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: 23 January, 2003 02:42
> To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SECRETS OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 9
>
>
> Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 9
>
> Real Contesters don't cry about perceived (1) slights, (2)
> dis-advantages,
> or (3) the eternal non-level playing field.
>
> Or, as a wise, old sage once wrote in a 1974 NCJ,
> (paraphrased here, because
> the sage can no longer remember), "Realize that some
> locations (or, uh,
> opportunities) will ALWAYS have the advantage. If you don't like your
> location, MOVE"
>
> Expeditions for contests and DXing have been around since the days of
> Marconi. Always have been; always will be.
>
> Fraternally yours,
>
> Jim Neiger N6TJ
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
|