> Actually, if you tin the coax braid after you strip the outer jacket but
> before you trim it, then use a small copper tubing cutter to cut the
> braid,
> assembly and soldering PL-259's are easy. Just use a small torch, paint
> stripping heat gun, or a big iron to heat the outer conductor of the
> PL-259
> and feed solder into the holes to complete the connection. After I remove
> the excess (tinned) braid, I trim the dialectric about 1/8" beyond the end
> of the braid and tin the center conductor also before assembly.
>
>
> ::Beware of tinning the braid of coaxial cable. Although I see many do
> this, and I've seen it recommended countless times by fellow hams, it is
> not a recommended process per the cable or connector manufacturers, at
> all. Tinning the braid of typical PE dielectric cables overheats the
> dielectric causing distortion and even permanent chemistry changes that
> are not good for the cable. (Note tinning the braid of PTFE cables is not
> an issue, but is typically a waste of time and solder since most PTFE
> coaxial cables have pre-tinned or silver-plated braid materials to which
> solder flows instantly.) If you refer to the military work instructions
> for the assembly and installation of type PL-259 on coaxial cable, there
> is no mention of tinning the braid, and they are correct. Worse still is
> when using cellular PE dielectric cables such as all "foam" products
> (Belden 8214, Times LMR400, etc, etc) -- the braids of those types should
> *never* be tinned, as this simple and quick operation greatly exceeds the
> melting point of the cellular PE and routinely causes permanent damage.
> If the correct solder and methods are used, it's easy to flow solder to
> untinned copper braid through the four solder holes found in the PL-259
> connector body, and doing so does not usually risk reflowing the PE
> because the braid temperature doesn't exceed the melting point of solder.
> When a 700 to 900 degree (F) iron is applied directly to the braid, rather
> than via the connector body, the braid temperature is elevated to the iron
> temperature easily and damage is always risked.
>
> ::In the industry for mass production of PL-259 cable assemblies, the
> standard tool used is a 900W resistance soldering station with its
> associated probes. That tool is applied to the screwed-on (mounted)
> connector body and elevates the connector body to soldering temperature in
> less than one second. Solder is applied to the four holes as the
> connector is rotated, and the current is removed. The entire operation
> takes about five seconds to complete, so current (and thus heat) is only
> applied for that amount of time, which is insufficient time to distort the
> dielectric material. Distortion is less likely using this method, anyway,
> since no mechanical pressure is exerted on the cable, which is snugly
> resting inside the connector body. I've overseen production lines
> building more than 2000 such assemblies in an 8-hour shift, and the
> resulting output are 100% sweep tested from 10 kHz through 500 MHz, then
> hipot tested to 1500Vac, and we get about 99.5% yields. Using a
> soldering-iron "pre-tin the braid" approach, yields drop to less than 30%
> good on the sweep and hipot test.
>
> ::I can do the same thing with simple tools at a much slower rate, using a
> single-edged razor blade for all trimming, a 120W 1/2" tip Weller SP-120
> iron and ordinary 60/40 rosin core solder -- but with the same
> satisfactory yield. Production slows to about one connector per minute
> this way, but isn't bad for a ham station. Results using a torch, or
> using a soldering "gun" are too variable to predict.
>
> ::Always solder the braid to the connector body first when assembling
> PL-259s. Wait for the body to cool down to near ambient before soldering
> the center pin.
>
> ::I have never had a PL-259 connector fail in service, in 37 years. Then,
> I do restrict my output power to about 1500W PEP or so....! -WB2WIK/6
>
>
> This is easier done than said.
>
> Or, you may consider a crimp tool and crimp connectors. Sorry, I cannot
> remember where I obtained mine but it cost about $50. MIL spec crimp
> tools
> are several hundred $$. The crimp connectors are hard to find but are
> available.
>
> de Paul, W8AEF
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
>
> > Anyone know a good source for custom made coax cables... I hate
> > soldering pl-259's and expect to need a dozen or more cables made for
> > various upgrades planned for this summer. I would want a place that
> > would use good rg-213, measure it accurately to my lengths, use
> > silver/Teflon pl-259's and solder them well in all 4 holes.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>From w8aef@worldnet.att.net Tue Feb 4 14:14:51 2003
Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net
[204.127.131.116])
by contesting.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h14JEp2O018847
for <towertalk@contesting.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:14:51 -0500
Received: from desktop
(78.phoenix-02rh16rt-az.dial-access.att.net[12.83.83.78])
by mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP
id <2003020419144811200h70cbe>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:14:49 +0000
Message-ID: <00aa01c2cc81$ae2ac040$8aaafea9@desktop>
From: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Robert" <rgshauger@earthlink.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
References: <000001c2cc0d$fbe49d20$c1c8bb3f@valueduser>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tashjian Towers...
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:36:37 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:28:56 -0500
X-BeenThere: towertalk@contesting.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tower and HF antenna construction topics. <towertalk.contesting.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,
<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/towertalk>
List-Post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
List-Help: <mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,
<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:14:51 -0000
Content-Length: 738
Lines: 25
I have an LM-470 and am very happy with it.
de Paul, W8AEF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert" <rgshauger@earthlink.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 5:26 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tashjian Towers...
> Hello all...
>
> I have been looking to buy a crank-up tower and I noticed an ad in QST
> for Tashjian Towers.
> I am curious, is there anyone here that bought a tower from them? Are
> there any operational or quality issues? Any opinions positive or
> negative will be welcomed.
>
> Thanks, Robert ai7m@arrl.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>From RedHaines@centurytel.net Tue Feb 4 13:40:23 2003
Received: from granger.centurytel.net (granger.centurytel.net
[209.142.136.117])
by contesting.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h14IeM2O012296
for <towertalk@contesting.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:40:23 -0500
Received: from centurytel.net (ppp011.lax.centurytel.net [207.230.192.42])
h14IeCPx023333; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:40:20 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <3E40090F.3050309@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:40:15 -0600
From: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (nscd2)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca>,
Towertalk
<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] coax cables
References: <200302020339.h123dEKV037031@orthanc.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: towertalk@contesting.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tower and HF antenna construction topics. <towertalk.contesting.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,
<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/towertalk>
List-Post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
List-Help: <mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>,
<mailto:towertalk-request@contesting.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 18:40:23 -0000
Content-Length: 186
Lines: 10
>
>
>I prefer the type N connectors, too. I haven't located a source of
>replacement gaskets, the rubber sealing rings that are cut during
>installation. Any help?
>
73 de WOØW
>
>
|