Greetings,
I agree completely, Chuck. I also am a "tangible" QSL card collector and have
wondered the same thing. I do know some contesters that either don't QSL or do
not want to, and LoTW is the perfect excuse for them not to even have any more
cards printed. I would settle for a downloadable authenticated QSL card if I
couldn't get it any other way, but I do want a tangible QSL card.
73, Gerry, K8GT
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2003 7:23 pm
Subject: [CQ-Contest] LoTW question
> Greetings!
>
> LoTW sounds quite good and I'm giving serious thought to uploading
> contestlogs that I generate from K3FT.
>
> K1VU asked ONE question that I've been seeking an answer for - and
> as of yet
> haven't found one. Perhaps ARRL is waiting till LoTW launch is fully
> successful and operational with lots of Q's before they announce
> that part
> of the information.
>
>
> I have a more specific question. Since many folks will use LoTW in
> lieu of
> QSL'ing with 'the old fashioned loveable "pasteboard" card... WILL
> this make
> it MORE difficult for folks like me who PREFER the 'good old fashioned
> cardboard QSL via snail-mail to get one?
>
> In other words.. NOW, if you are an active station and you get
> QSL's via
> regular mail from someone who also uploaded logs (and obviated the
> need to
> exchange the card) and for which you don't really NEED a card
> (like WHO
> REALLY needs a K3 from MD, if you are ACTIVE?? ;-) and I send you
> one in the
> mail.. do you believe that this would REDUCE my chances of getting
> a return
> card? I tend to use SASE's as a rule so that's not a cost
> question on the
> other station.
>
> The 2nd part of the question is this... Is a DX station who would
> normallyuse 'the burro' more likely than not to QSL if he knows
> that the other
> station also uses LoTW?
>
> My personal preference is that I LIKE the old fashioned way. It is a
> tangible item, it makes for a great conversation piece and there
> is just
> 'SOMETHING' about being able to pull out a pile of cards (or one
> card) and
> enjoy the trip down memory lane. You know what I mean.
>
> I'm NOT trying to begin a large thread on this.. but it's
> something that has
> been niggling at my mind for some time. Ancillary to that is this
> part. If
> LoTW (and other aspects of electronic QSO logging/storing on
> remote systems
> takes a good strong hold, how soon before we see (electronically
> authenticated) QSL's that are displayed and available for me to
> print out on
> the printer without any thing being sent through the mail?
>
> I'm NOT against that - I'm NO Luddite as evidenced by the fact I
> sent this
> via Internet and my PC. :-)
>
> It gets back to the intangible 'SOMETHING' that comes from having
> a card
> that someone filled out, mailed, and was sent to me..
>
> Dunno.. Am I looking at this from an 'old fashioned, I'm afraid of
> the new
> stuff' perspective OR am I suffering withdrawal pains at the
> thought of not
> being able to do things the good old-fashioned comfortable way?
>
> 73
>
> Chuck K3FT
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|