[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments

To: <K1ZM@aol.com>, <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments
From: <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:34:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Absolutely Jeff, I agree , do not touch the present 48 hour AB category.
Just add a AB 24 category within the 48 hours.
Glenn VA3DX

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to K5ZD's Comments

> Hi Glen
> I would support the notion of ADDITIONAL categories as long as the main,
> long-tenured 48 hour (no time limit) category remains viable for single-op
> band unassisted entrants - as, to me, that is the "grand-daddy" of them
all -
> kinda like the DECATHALON in the Olympics..  I think it would be a real
> to dilute that - even though I can see the day coming when I probably
won't be
> able to handle it myself - HI!  If the sponsoring organizations are
willing to
> ADD such classes for others who have less time to devote (or less energy),
> then that would seem to make sense to me.  I would line up behind it....
> So YES - your idea for additional categories would make sense to me.  Just
> pse do not amend what is the CLASSIC version of the contest - eg: no NEW
> let's stick with the "CLASSIC COKE" for those who still can handle it!

    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>