[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking up the wrong ARRL DX tree

To: w4pa@yahoo.com ("Scott R."), cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking up the wrong ARRL DX tree
From: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:16:45 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Scott, thanks for at least admitting that geography creates an advantage.  
Also, I am thankful that you have made a distinction between rules and score 
reporting. My reading of most contest rules does not support the kind of score 
reporting done in the contest writeups.  Top ten lists, top five lists or, on 
some occasions top two lists, are not provided for in the rules and are, for 
the most part, editorial policy.  This kind of policy should change, as, I 
believe, many really worthwhile efforts go unrecognized.  The ARRL's regional 
lists are an imperfect step in the right direction.  I'd like to see other 
contest sponsors adopt and, hopefully improve on, that kind of policy.  I'm 
sure many others agree.  Otherwise, the path to recognition means to 
subordinate every other part of our lives to that end.  A truly unbalanced set 
of priorities.


"Scott R." <w4pa@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>My point is that US and VE stations should count as
>>separate countries for scoring and awards purposes.
>>US should compete with US and VE's with VE's. ?Just the 
>>same way DL's compete with DL's and G's with G's!
>>I am very interested to read what other contesters think about this
>>situation. ?I think that it is time to change the rules. ?What do YOU
>>Bob KQ2M
>Bob - 
>In a nutshell: ?I think "tough cookies". ?K1ZM saw an advantage,
>exploited it, and has apparently won both modes of ARRL DX. ?Good for
>him. ?I'd do the same thing if I could work it out. ?There have been
>plenty of ARRL DX SSB single op wins from the United States. ?
>My view: ?the problem is not one of below/above 14150. ?The problem is
>that DX contesting essentially is a non-competitive exercise for the
>vast majority of the United States and Canada. ?Until the scoring for
>DX contests is based on the distance of the contact rather than just
>the sheer number of contacts and countries contacted, there is little
>sense in making any other changes to rules or score reporting for the
>The only solution, if you want to compete, is to go to where the
>geographic advantage exists. ?Atlantic Canada is as good a spot as any.
>Scott W4PA
>Dump Internet Explorer today - download the Mozilla Firefox web browser 
> ? ? ? ?
>Yahoo! Messenger 
>Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
>CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>