[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking Up the Wrong ARRL DX Tree

To: k0luz@topsusa.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking Up the Wrong ARRL DX Tree
From: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:19:46 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How interesting:

KQ2M, a guy who enjoys almost all the advantages possible for an ARRL DX Test 
is complaining because someone else has one he doesn't. 

East coasters, in general, deflect mention of this by pointing out that in 
other contests, other locations have advantages they don't.

All seem to understand that a location with a salt water path to europe which 
does not pass through the aurora oval is a distinct advantage, and that a 
similar path to JA, which was, at one time, an off setting advantage, no longer 

All seem to understand that the playing field isn't level.

I'm sure all contesters not located north of the mason dixon lne and east of 
the Alleghenies seek out and exploit whatever natural advantage they can find.

At least one respondent has been able to differentiate between contests rules 
and the contest writeup.

Most of us understand there are conditions (aurora, solar flux) which either 
increase or decrease the advantage already held by stations in the NE.

Yet, we can't seem to find a way to recognize contest efforts of merit that 
take place outside the northeast.  Amazing.

73 de Jim
W0UO/5 (a better place that W0)
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>