[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2006 and Writelog

To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2006 and Writelog
From: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:18:58 +0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon MØCLW" <m0clw@ftml.net>
> Quoting further from Rule 8: "Nevertheless TR and CT could be used
> but the Committee does not assume any responsibility on the
> conversion to cabrillo. We will ask CT and TR to develop a specific
> version for WRTC 2006 in order to mitigate or eliminate problems on
> the conversion to cabrillo."
> Now, this strikes me as being overly odd. Firstly, why should any
> problems be encountered on the conversion to Cabrillo? Exporting a
> log in Cabrillo format for a contest is now de facto standard, and
> just about any contester can do this. And I have no doubt that WRTC
> competitors will have absolutely no qualms/problems in exporting to
> Cabrillo. So, what's the issue?

The issue is propably that in the last WRTC, these softwares couldn't make 
conversion to CORRECT Cabrillo format. It seemed not to be so easy after 

73, Timo OH1NOA 

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>