[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC

To: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC
From: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:49:47 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Why do so many people say that?
Seemed very straight forward to me.
Zip, zap, zoop and you are on.
Then I forgot to renew my certificates.
No problem, bop back on & get them redone.
Couple of minutes each time.
Some things in life are tough.
Contesting software may be one of them--
LOTW is not.

At 06:47 PM 4/20/2005, Blake M. wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jim Rhodes" <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
> > When I apply for credit at a bank I expect them to validate my ability to
> > pay it off. And that is only money.
>Not a fair comparison, Jim.
>Applying for bank credit is much simpler than getting LOTW to work.
>Blake N4GI
>CQ-Contest mailing list

Jim Rhodes K0XU

Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone.

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>