CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question

To: <mail@fkurz.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:09:05 +0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Fabian, I have told sponsors of the CQ-M  about this mistake and they
are committed to rectify the problem and delete this compulsory /QRP
staff next year. Let us hope that they will be prudent enough not to
upgrade you into LP from QRP.
73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabian Kurz" <lists@telegraphy.de>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 8:09 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Yet another CQ-M Question


> Hello all,
>
> I just decided to take part in the CQ-M contest in the
QRP-category,
> but this excerpt from the rules puzzled me a bit:
>
> ,---- [ http://srr.ru/CONTEST/cq_m_4_eng.php ] ------------------.
> | B4 Single Operator - All bands QRP - Mixed                     |
> |     (PEP RF Output Power not more than 5 Watts. The participant|
> |      has to send "/QRP" after his callsign in the contest)     |
> '----------------------------------------------------------------'
>
> I have to send "/QRP"? Why? And why do LP stations not have to
> send "/LP" then, single band stations "/SB"? - Because it makes no
> sense!
> Is that just a comfortable way to get rid of those weak QRP
> signals by making the rules in a way that many OPs cannot legally
> take part (because signing /QRP is not legal in many countries;
> it is not a part of the callsign)?
> Furthermore I cannot see why QRP stations should have the extra
> disadvantage of sending 4 more characters.
> Finally, the rule is almost impossible to check, because most OPs
> do not log the "/QRP" addition (for a good reason).
>
> I will work with QRP in CQ-M (only option at current QTH) and
> sign DJ1YFK. If the organizers chose to upgrade me into the LP
> category, that's fine with me; I won't score high anyway.
> If they see that enforcing this rule makes no sense: even
> better :-).
>
> 73,
> --
> Fabian Kurz, DJ1YFK * Dresden, Germany * http://fkurz.net/
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>