CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] TR is King

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TR is King
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:50:51 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
VE4XT added:

>I'll admit, however, that as good a contest logger as TR is, it's not good 
>as a general QSO logger. Perhaps that's a reason to go to WL?

Yes, if you want to do more than be able to operate & log standard QSO
info, TR might not be the right thing for day-to-day use.

Otherwise, it's flexibility is fantastic.  I have yet to find a contest I 
couldn't
get it to support enough to operate (with the exception of some with pretty
unique scoring methods) & can even be made to make Cabrillo for contests
that aren't supported by Cabrillo.  RTTY, too.

And with CT networking support, I can still be a part of a multi-multi & not
have to get my head around CT again.

Gee, why can't religions do that?  ;^)

73, VR2BrettGraham

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>