CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule
From: "K5ZM" <k5zm@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:31:01 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
FWIW, *this* is how I would interpret the M/S rules, too. And for the same
reasons. 

73, 

Ian, K5ZM

"See" you all from PJ2B! 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dennis O'Connor
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 September, 2005 7:27 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule
> 
> The MULTI in MS refers to the number of operators participating, and the
SINGLE
> in MS specifies the number of  simultaneous transmitters... Simple logic
shows
> that it cannot be a SINGLE-transmitter class if more than one transmitter
is on
> simultaneously... You cannot have it both ways!
> 
> The rule as written is crystal clear... It says that an MS station can
ignore the ten
> minute rule for BAND CHANGES if and only if the band change is to make a
single
> Q for a new multiplier... Nowhere does it waive the SINGLE-transmitter
rule, for
> if it did the station would now be in the multi-transmitter class...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> denny
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>