CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] An Innocent Question about Grid-4's/Grid-Fields andHF

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] An Innocent Question about Grid-4's/Grid-Fields andHF
From: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> > Grid-4 or Grid-Field
> > based scoring for HF events seems non-political
> > and easy to implement, yet it isn't (for the
> > v-a-s-t majority of HF events).  Why is that?
> 
> It may *seem* non-political, but that would be a
> naive observation.

I used the term "non-political" within the context
used by map makers.  A political map changes over
time, whim and military action.  Grids and Fields
don't, of course. :)

> If you implement the same scoring method
> for all contests, there is no difference between 
> them...they become contest fast food.  Yuck.

You may have misunderstood the intent of my inquiry,
Lee.  I am simply asking why grid/field based scoring
hasn't "taste tested" (using your analogy) well for
more HF events.  That's all.

It seems that tradition and history has a lot to do
with it.  Thanks to everyone for the info.  I truly
appreciate it.

Regards,
Ev



                
__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>