At 02:29 PM 10/27/2005, Paul O'Kane/EI5DI wrote:
>We know from this mailing-list that RST and zone are ignored by CQ for
>checking purposes.
Rather than feeling safe about not copying the zone, feel uneasy.
All we know is that CQ has apparently not checked the zone in recent years.
Things can change.
When I checked logs by hand at ARRL 25 years ago I learned more about checking
each contest. I'm sure the CQ checkers are learning a lot faster than I did
with the ease of e-mail to pass along questions, and the large number of
electronic logs to review.
The CQWW contest rules say to copy the zone. Do that. If a station sends
the wrong zone the checkers will give probably you credit for the right one
because they are pretty smart people. If a station sends something that
clearly isn't the right zone (serial number, power, age, etc), copy what was
sent. Those checking the logs generally understand about casual participants
and try not to ding anyone for that. If a station starts sending serial
number then changes to send the zone, the checkers will understand that as well
(some call it an "unstable exchange").
The log checking process should (and does) get better every year. There are
plenty of additional things that can be done in log checking and each year (or
contest) the checkers do some new things. One year they may look hard at
packet, the next they may look at signal reports (what?!), the next it might be
the 10-minute rules. Most of these are things that can eventually get
automated and done every time.
Remember, they didn't use to check for packet users either.
-- Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> http://www.yccc.org/
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|