| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs? |
| From: | mwdink@eskimo.com |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:48:00 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
RG213 or LMR400? I thought LMR 400 but the data in George W2VJN's Station Interference book would seem to indicate otherwise. RG213 would be cheaper. Anybody else had experience with stubs made of LMR400? 73 dink _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Award ..., Jose Pinto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet, K3BU |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Sunday fun, David Hachadorian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs?, k7qq |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |