>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ext
>LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad
>Sent: 14 November, 2005 18:35
>To: Steve GW4BLE; cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Steve GW4BLE
>Sent: 12. november 2005 13:51
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK
>
>
>I think we can close the thread on this one now; the last line
>on my original post of November 5th read -
>
>(anyone wish to second this, and forward to committee for
>consideration? I tried in previous years, but no action).
>
>73
>
>Steve
>GW4BLE
>
>
>
>I second this.
>
>73 Rag LA5HE
I oppose... Providing the question is unnecessarily resticting the
allowed usage of 40m in R1.
Jukka OH6LI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|