CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was:Logcheckingquestion

To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was:Logcheckingquestions]
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:47:48 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> [Original Message]
> From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
> To: <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: 12/17/2005 4:38:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tossing meaningless categories [was:
Logcheckingquestions]
>
> At 12:46 PM 12/16/2005, K0HB wrote:
>
> >Wouldn't satisfy me.  If we can only have two categories, I'd like to
see:
> >
> >1) I did it all myself. (LP/HP/QRP)
> >
> >2) I had some help from some other guys. (LP/HP/QRP/Packet/Multi Op)
> >
> >73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Your focus is on personnel; mine is on hardware. I believe there 
> should be a combination of both.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT

No, Bill,  my focus is a blend of both personal skill and station design.  
Note the '(LP/HP/QRP)' sub-categories.

73, de Hans, K0HB






_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>